This week, it was announced Hollywood offspring royalty Bella Cruise was launching a clothing line.
As a standalone fact, the world was unperturbed. Until, of course, it was revealed exactly what the name of the line would be: Bella Kidman Cruise.
Cruise, a 25-year-old artist who is the daughter of Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman, has been known publicly, for the better part of her whole life, as Bella Cruise.
Though little has been confirmed since the Cruise/Kidman split, much speculation centred on the inability for Kidman to stay close to her children because of the Church of Scientology. It was reported that differences in religious beliefs caused a rift between the actress and her two children.
Listen: From Charlize Theron in Monster, to Nicole Kidman in The Hours, why do women have to ‘go ugly’ to win an Oscar? Post continues after audio.
Of course, Tom Cruise is the Church’s most famous member, with his children staying within the church following the break down of their parents’ marriage in 2001. It’s widely believed that since then, the Church, Tom and their children viewed their mother as a “suppressive person”, meaning she can and should be shunned by members of the church.
In fact, former scientologist Leah Remini wrote her 2015 book Troublemaker: Surviving Hollywood and Scientology, that she once asked Bella if she saw much of her mother.
“Not if I have a choice. Our mum is a f**king SP [suppressive person],” she reportedly said, according to Remini.
Top Comments
It's not that Tom and Nicole weren't invited to Bella's wedding. They all agreed that their presence their would take over Bella's day (papparazzi etc) and they agreed to have a private celebration later.
This article says that Bella is married, so why is she not using her husband's surname for the clothing line (assuming that she did take her husband's name when they got married)??
Because using her famous parents' surnames will (MAYBE) get more attention and publicity for her clothing line!!
That is the ONLY reason why she's included Nicole's surname, along with Tom's surname, and not her husband's surname. I doubt it's got anything to do with her & Nicole's relationship at all.
Possibly she didn't take her husband's name - as many women nowadays don't - so why *wouldn't* she use her parents names? Cruise is her surname too, and I'm pretty sure she was Kidman-Cruise as a kid when Tom and Nicole were still together. Is she just supposed to have no name of her own?
How positively archaic, I've been married for almost 13 years and didn't take my husband's name, and my mother didn't take her husband's name either.