User Comments

caitlin r December 5, 2022

@Plasticletterbox yes, many people experience loneliness, but this is not alleviated by owning a female-shaped piece of silicone with penetrable orifices. An object is not a human - it cannot provide companionship, just sex on demand. We can acknowledge the reality that reducing women and children to the status of objects to be sexually used is harmful. 

It is also the case that paedophiles are not using child sex abuse dolls instead of sexually offending against children, but in addition to this. While it's true child sex abuse dolls are illegal in Australia, paedophiles continue to try to import them or make their own, and go to extreme lengths to get around laws - like purchasing childlike dolls with large, fake, removable breasts, concealing them in safes and other items, and ordering dolls with no holes and creating them themselves. There is no justification for creating replica women and girls for the purpose of men's unlimited sexual use, least of all because men feel entitled to them. 

caitlin r November 29, 2022

I’ve been researching sex dolls and men who own dolls for several years. I’ve recently published a book on the topic (Sex Dolls, Robots and Woman Hating - Spinifex Press) on how the trade in these products - replica women and girls existing for men’s unlimited sexual use - harms women and girls.

Having spent years documenting how many of these men regard women, I believe this article does a disservice to women. From women who have been devastated to learn of sex dolls made in their likeness, women whose husbands chose their sex doll over them, and child sex abuse dolls modelled on little girls, toddlers and infants, we have to ask who benefits from these products.

Sex dolls are overwhelmingly made in the female form and marketed to men. They are premised on the objectification of women, the belief that women are things to be used sexually, and that men are entitled to sex.

Articles like this encourage readers to overlook the inherent misogyny of these products and the sexual entitlement of men who purchase them. They perpetuate the myth that the production and male use of female-bodied sex dolls is harmless, that men who buy them are lonely and deserving of sympathy, and that men have a right to sex.

At a time when the global research clearly identifies the objectification of women and men’s attitudes of entitlement as significant contributing factors in men’s violence against women, I’m curious as to why Mamamia is seeking to normalise and promote these sexist products?

caitlin r November 28, 2022

I’ve been researching sex dolls and men who own dolls for several years. I’ve recently published a book on the topic, on how the trade in these products - replica women and girls existing for men’s unlimited sexual use - harms women and girls. 

 
Having spent years documenting how many of these men regard women, I believe this article does a disservice to women. From women who have been devastated to learn of sex dolls made in their likeness, women whose husbands chose their sex doll over them, and child sex abuse dolls modelled on little girls, toddlers and infants, we have to ask who benefits from these products. 
 
Sex dolls are overwhelmingly made in the female form and marketed to men. They are premised on the objectification of women, the belief that women are things to be used sexually, and that men are entitled to sex. 
 
Articles like this encourage readers to overlook the inherent misogyny of these products and the sexual entitlement of men who purchase them. They perpetuate the myth that the production and male use of female-bodied sex dolls is harmless, that men who buy them are lonely and deserving of sympathy, and that men have a right to sex. 
 
At a time when the global research clearly identifies the objectification of women and men’s attitudes of entitlement as significant contributing factors in men’s violence against women, I’m curious as to why Mamamia is seeking to normalise and promote these sexist products?